Is there something wrong in kWh/Yr calculation in Evo Street lighting?
9341 W/Km x 4000 hrs/year should be 37364 kWh/Yr/Km, right?
7882 W/Km x 4000 hrs/year should be 31582 kWh/Yr/Km right?
What am i missing here?
Search found 30 matches
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:00 pm
- Forum: Using DIALux evo
- Topic: Street light Photometry
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1996
HI The luminaire photometry added from lumsearch was showing strange orientation of the fixture. Is there no way of rotating the photometry files? there seems to be only pole parameters, in dialux we have the option rotate the photometry to different axis.. and also orient the luminaires the way we ...
Hi Glad to see all the available options in documentation after the patch releases.. Able to get landscape images in full page size... would be great if 3dview of normal view and false colour view are of same size... Able to choose between values, false colours and isolines for calculation objects.....
Dear Kolja Thanks for the response.. No misunderstanding, at least from my side.. 1. What if I want landscape as my default orientation because all the 3d views are more legible and i don't have to separately save images and create another design document. Why will i want some pages in portrait and ...
Hi After having used dialux and dialux evo from their introduction for over 10 years, i am feeling disappointed with the compulsions of subscribing to Pro version... Even the basic options of portrait/landscape is removed, including multiple 3d views in the report has been removed. Can't change any ...